Home Archive Committees & Speakers Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 9, Issue 1, 2025
Pages: 23 -
Abstract
Engineering and Technology
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 21
PDF Downloads: 8
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Abstract Engineering and Technology

CHARACTERIZATION OF THE STONE FROM THE JOŠANICA QUARRY AND THE POSSIBILITY FOR ITS APPLICATION

By
Dragica Lazić ,
Dragica Lazić
Contact Dragica Lazić

University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Technology Zvornik, Karakaj 34a , Zvornik, Republic of Srpska , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Dragana Kešelj ,
Dragana Kešelj

University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Technology Zvornik, Karakaj 34a , Zvornik, Republic of Srpska , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Gordana Ostojić ,
Gordana Ostojić

Alumina factory “Alumina D.O.O.”, Karakaj , Zvornik , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Milenko Smiljanić ,
Milenko Smiljanić

University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Technology Zvornik, Karakaj 34a , Zvornik, Republic of Srpska , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Nebojša Vasiljević ,
Nebojša Vasiljević

University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Technology Zvornik, Karakaj 34a , Zvornik, Republic of Srpska , Bosnia and Herzegovina

University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technology, Bulevar cara Lazara 1 , Novi Sad , Serbia

Pavle Lončar
Pavle Lončar

University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Technology Zvornik, Karakaj 34a , Zvornik, Republic of Srpska , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Stone samples were sampled from three fields: Field A, Field B, and Field C. In this work, chemical and mineralogical analysis of the stone was performed. The chemical analysis of the stone was done by volumetric, complexometric, spectrophotometric, gravimetric and X-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF). Mineralogical analysis was done by XRD analysis. Analyzes show that calcite is the dominant mineral in most samples, while dolomite is significantly present in some samples. Chemical analysis shows that calcium dominates in samples 2 (Field B) and 3a and 3b (Field C), with only negligible amounts of magnesium. In contrast, samples 1a, 1b, and 1c (Field A) contain a significant amount of magnesium. According to the MgCO3 content, the presence of dolomite in the stone was calculated. The content of CaCO3 bound in dolomite is lower than that present in the stone sample, which confirms that it is present in some other form. According to the dolomite content, samples 1a, 1b, and 1c (Field A) are classified as limestone-dolomite, while samples 2 (Field B) and 3a and 3b (Field C) are classified as limestone due to their high calcium carbonate content. Mineralogical analysis confirms the chemical analysis.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.